Project Artifacts
Project artifacts live under .oat/projects/<scope>/<project>/.
Core artifacts
state.md: lifecycle state and checkpoint metadatadiscovery.md: problem framing, constraints, solution space exploration (for exploratory requests), and discovery outcomesspec.md: requirements + acceptance criteriadesign.md: architecture and implementation approach (full in spec-driven mode; optional lightweight version in quick mode covering architecture, components, and testing strategy)plan.md: phase/task breakdown and review trackingimplementation.md: execution log, verification, final summarysummary.md: institutional memory artifact — generated from project artifacts at closeout, used as PR description source and archive cover page
Mode-sensitive notes:
state.mdincludes workflow mode metadata (spec-driven,quick,import) for routing.spec.mdanddesign.mdare required in spec-driven mode, optional in quick/import mode. Quick mode offers a lightweightdesign.md(architecture, components, testing strategy) at a post-discovery decision point.plan.mdremains canonical execution artifact across all modes.
Supporting artifacts
summary.md: generated byoat-project-summary— re-runnable, tracks its own state via frontmatter for incremental updates after revisionsreviews/*.md: phase/final review filespr/*.md: generated PR descriptionsreferences/imported-plan.md: preserved source plan for import modereferences/split-plan.json: persisted split plan for a coordination parent, used as the durable resume source whenoat-project-splitis interrupted
Explainer artifacts
Explainer Kit writes project runs under
<resolved-project-path>/explainers/<slug>/. The two project products have
different retention contracts:
-
A
project-explaineris a working artifact. In a shared project it can be tracked while the project is active, but project completion removes it from the tracked branch with the active project tree. It remains only in the local archived project. -
A selected final
project-recapis a durable completion record. Before a shared project is removed, archive copies the complete selected run to.oat/repo/reference/project-recaps/<YYYYMMDD-project-slug>/, verifies its immutable package hashes, and reports that tracked export path. Summary and PR links use this export, never the gitignored local archive. Lifecycle callers identify the selected project-relative run with:oat project archive <project-path> \ --project-recap-run explainers/<recap-slug>
The archive exports at most one selected recap package. It preserves structured
failure outcomes and successful intermediates, rejects an existing dated
destination, and requires the selected path to stay under the project's
explainers/ directory with a project-recap manifest. Verification covers
the complete mode-aware package:
- privacy-safe request and content approval;
- fact-base JSON and Markdown;
- the five immutable set-plan records and authored drafts;
- declared author results and authored content;
- resolved theme and every built artifact;
- canonical mobile, tablet, and desktop screenshots;
- paired
browser-evidence/v2metrics with launched Chromium name, version, and capture identity; - cohesion observations and each visual-review request/result; and
- the bounded revision record when a correction occurred.
Canonical object hashes identify normalized fact-base, theme, runtime, and
capture objects; manifest.immutableHashes independently covers serialized file
bytes. The archive requires one complete, internally consistent browser and
review chain for a successful unattended recap. Missing, stale, forged,
cross-record-mismatched, or tampered coverage fails before the active project is
deleted.
built-needs-review is a terminal review-gate outcome, not a non-durable
success. Its partial evidence remains available for diagnosis, but it cannot be
finalized, exported, attested, archived, or pushed. Review and rebuild the recap
to a passing visual-review outcome first.
Local-scope projects are not archived through this export path. Their explainer
packages inherit the local project's untracked posture and remain
built-not-durable unless independent publish evidence exists. Non-project OAT
explainer runs use .oat/repo/reference/explainers/<slug>/; direct core callers
must provide their own explicit output root.
Gate review frontmatter
Review artifacts produced by oat gate review use the normal review fields plus
an exact copy of the gate-owned configured invocation:
oat_review_invocation: gate
oat_project: .oat/projects/shared/example
oat_gate_run_id: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
oat_gate_target: codex-sol-max
oat_gate_runtime: codex
oat_invocation_model: gpt-5.6-sol
oat_invocation_reasoning_effort: max
oat_invocation_source: exec-target-configoat_invocation_model and oat_invocation_reasoning_effort may be
provider-default when OAT deliberately leaves a control to the provider, or
unknown when the target does not declare it. These fields are configured
invocation metadata, not runtime-confirmed or self-reported model identity.
Manual and auto review artifacts do not require the gate-only fields.
Contract
Artifacts are the project system of record; automation and routing should derive from these files, not memory.
Formatting and verification hygiene
Tracked artifacts are part of the repository diff, so artifact writers format
them before finishing or committing. During plan authoring, OAT resolves the
repository's documented write/fix command from applicable AGENTS.md /
CLAUDE.md instructions and relevant package manifests. Each task that writes
an artifact receives a concrete invocation, scoped to that task's files when
the command supports paths.
Downstream implementers execute that supplied command without repeating discovery. Roles and lifecycle skills that write outside a planned task, including reviewers and documentation, summary, PR, and quick-start flows, use the same discovery procedure as a fallback. Gate-originated review prompts also carry the contract so review artifacts follow the same rule across runtimes.
Writers must:
- prefer a documented write/fix command over a check-only command;
- avoid inferring or hardcoding a formatter;
- scope the write to created or edited files when supported;
- avoid whole-tree rewrites that could absorb unrelated changes; and
- warn once with
no format command discovered in repo instructions; skippingwhen no command is discoverable, then continue.
Formatting supplements the applicable verification contract. Phase implementation runs repository gates over its produced diff, including artifact writes. Prose-only lifecycle work runs only checks relevant to the files it changed.
Coordination parents
Project splitting introduces a coordination-only parent artifact. It records shared context and child relationships, but it is not an executable lifecycle project.
A coordination parent uses:
oat_kind: coordinationoat_phase: decompositionoat_phase_status: complete
Coordination parents do not contain executable phase files. spec.md, design.md, plan.md, and implementation.md are removed from the parent and represented in state prose as not applicable.
The parent still keeps state.md, discovery.md, and references/split-plan.json. Child projects are flat siblings and link back to the parent through state metadata. Each child starts from a distilled discovery seed and must revalidate inherited context before moving beyond discovery/design.
See Project Splitting for the full parent/child model.
plan.md frontmatter
plan.md carries frontmatter that the implementation skill consumes. Notable fields:
oat_plan_hill_phases— list of phase IDs to pause at for HiLL checkpoints.oat_plan_parallel_groups— declares which phases may execute concurrently in worktrees. See below.oat_phase_review_gate— opt-in non-pausing external review gate that runs after a phase's standard reviewer passes. See below.
oat_plan_parallel_groups
Declare phase groups that run in parallel during oat-project-implement:
oat_plan_parallel_groups: [['p02', 'p03'], ['p04', 'p05']]Each inner array is a group of phases that execute concurrently in their own worktrees and merge back to the orchestration branch in plan order. Phases not listed in any group run sequentially.
Semantics:
- Empty or missing field → fully sequential, no worktrees created (default).
- Each group must contain 2 or more phases — singleton groups are rejected.
- Every phase ID must exist in the plan body.
- No phase may appear in more than one group.
- Parallelism is only honored at Tier 1 (native subagents). Tier 2 degrades parallel groups to sequential target-preserving execution, not unconditional inline review. Concrete managed Claude reviewers retain the exact resolver-returned
dispatchArgs.model; Cursor reviewers retain the exactproviders.cursor.dispatchArgs.variantnative agent type; Codex retains its exact role or pinned child. Every retry preserves the complete target. Inline review requires verified equivalent host controls or an explicit inherit/default or managed-uncapped base-role exception, and otherwise blocks.
Authoring responsibility:
oat-project-planproposes parallel groups when phases have file-disjoint task sets; it never infers parallelism silently.- Phases listed in a group should have no file-level overlap. Overlap will produce merge conflicts during fan-in that stop the run.
Validation:
Before dispatching, oat-project-implement invokes oat project validate-plan --project-path "${PROJECT_PATH}". Non-zero exit blocks the run. See CLI Reference and Implementation Execution for details.
oat_phase_review_gate
Enable an optional, non-pausing external review gate that runs after each selected phase's standard reviewer passes and its bookkeeping is committed:
Planning offers this setting after stable phase IDs exist and before the plan
artifact review. The read-only target probe qualifies only an explicitly
configured, enabled, and available target, then offers all phases, selected
phases, or disabled. An explicit oat_phase_review_gate value from a resumed or
imported plan is preserved unchanged without re-prompting. If the probe fails,
no target qualifies, the run is non-interactive, or the user declines, planning
leaves phase review disabled.
oat_phase_review_gate:
enabled: true
phases: [] # empty or omitted = every implementation phase
review_type: code
exit_nonzero_on: importantSemantics:
- Missing,
null, orenabled: false→ disabled (default).enabled: trueactivates the gate. phases→ optional. Empty or missing runs the gate after every implementation phase; a populated list restricts it to those phase IDs, each of which must exist in the plan body.review_type→ optional, defaults tocode. Onlycodeis supported for phase gates.exit_nonzero_on→ optional, defaults toimportant. One ofcritical,important,medium,minor. This is the blocking threshold: findings at or above it stop the phase; sub-threshold findings are dispositioned by the judgment sweep rather than ignored.
A malformed gate stops the run before task execution rather than being silently disabled. The gate is independent of HiLL checkpoints and reuses the existing oat gate review target config — it does not hardcode a --target. See Reviews → Phase review gate for the runtime behavior and disposition rules.
Reference artifacts
.oat/templates/*.md.oat/projects/<scope>/<project>/spec.md.oat/projects/<scope>/<project>/design.md.oat/projects/<scope>/<project>/plan.md.oat/projects/<scope>/<project>/implementation.md.oat/projects/<scope>/<project>/summary.md